FAQ

An ERC-20 token on Ethereum with a fixed supply, whose liquidity sits in sixteen Uniswap V2 pools that nobody — including its builders — can withdraw from.

Any DEX or aggregator; CoW Swap is a reasonable default for an asset spread across sixteen pools.

Contract: 0xDfC5964141c018485b4d017634660f85aa667714. Verify against a second source. Full guide.

No. There is no action that turns benefits on. Holding is holding.

Providing liquidity and wrapping into pValhalla are separate activities with their own costs and risks; neither is required.

No, and there won't be. No governance, no vote, no mechanism to add one. The reasoning.

The LP tokens — the receipts that would let someone withdraw the pooled liquidity — were sent to an address with no private key. Fourteen pools directly, one via burned lock ownership, one via a staking burn chain.

Not time-locked, not vested. There is no date on which they become withdrawable, because there is no key to withdraw them with. Detail.

There is no mechanism through which it could happen. The token's owner is the zero address, the pools have no admin surface, and the LP tokens are unreachable. Don't take that on trust — it's checkable in about ten minutes.

Diversification (one failing counter-asset can't take down a sixteen-anchored token), arbitrage volume (sixteen pools constantly disagree, and every disagreement pays fees), and sinks (capped counter-assets strand ODIN that can't be bought out at any price). The full argument.

Yes. Four of the sixteen trade rarely, so market data APIs return nothing for them. They're burned on-chain exactly like the others and hold real reserves. Dormant is a statement about attention, not liquidity.

Nothing on this site claims that, and the distinction is the core of ODIN's honesty posture.

The mechanism guarantees depth: a bid at every size, deepening with every trade, never withdrawable. Depth is not price. The paired assets can fall, and ODIN priced against them falls too.

Anything phrased as "holders may benefit from upward price pressure" is a price claim dressed up as a mechanism claim. You won't find it here. The boundary.

Across a trailing year, a fraction of a percent — arriving in steps, so annualising any single step is meaningless. Permanent and one-way, and also small on any horizon shorter than years. Both are true. Measure it yourself.

No. ODIN captures the swap fees paid by arbitrage and MEV volume. The arbitrage profit goes to the external searchers. On immutable V2 pools, recapture is impossible.

Descriptions like "auto take profit" or "the network secures gains" describe something else entirely. The precise version.

There isn't one. Providing liquidity earns a share of trading fees — entirely volume-dependent. Every rate shown anywhere in the network is a measurement of a past window, stated with that window attached. Nothing is offered, promised, or fixed.

• Paired assets can fall. The mechanism guarantees a bid, not a good one.
• Immutable contracts can't be patched. A bug would be permanent.
• Peapods' fee router is admin-mutable — the largest live dependency ODIN carries.
• Uniswap governance holds one lever — the protocol fee switch, capped at one-sixth of fee growth, already used once, with no ODIN vote.
• Volume can dry up. The ratchet needs fuel.
• Key-person risk. Discussed openly.

Dependencies in full.

Hacken lists an audit profile, but the public page exposes no report, date, or findings — so we'd rather say that than lean on the badge.

What does exist is full on-chain verification, which establishes the contracts can't change — not that they're bug-free. Different things.

No. Canonical ODIN is Ethereum mainnet only; same-ticker tokens elsewhere are different assets. Bridging is possible and gated on depth — a bridged ODIN only tracks mainnet if a bridge round-trip costs less than the spread it closes. The reasoning.

"Meme" here means community and shared cultural value — real groups of people with identity and belonging at stake, not shorthand for low-substance speculation.

Structurally, the community tokens also do a job: sixteen genuinely different assets disagree on price constantly, and disagreement generates the arbitrage volume the pools run on. The Synergy Loop.

No. The name predates the current identity and there's no lore in the brand. pValhalla survives because immutable contracts can't be renamed.

odinOS for people. /odindata for machines.

These docs deliberately carry very few figures — a number printed in documentation is stale the moment it's written. What's here is the method.

Telegram: t.me/OdinLiquidity · X: @odinliquidity